Tendensi Sosial di Balik Perumpamaan Unik Lukas: Analisis Tematis Lukas 9:51–19:44
Abstract
This article entitled "Social Tendencies Behind Luke's Unique Parable: Thematic Analysis of Luke 9:51–19:44" is a review to answer the meaning behind the inclusion of Luke's unique parable in chapter 9:51–19:44. This section is interesting because it is a narrative leading up to Jesus' death. The parable in it is similar to the last will of someone who will soon die. Several scholars have proposed various interpretations regarding the meaning of this unique parable. Through thematic analysis and literature study methods, it was found that the unique parable in Luke 9:51–19:44 has a social tendency, where the gospel is related to social equality, social concern, and social consequences. Luke pays more attention to social life in his gospel.
Abstrak
Artikel berjudul “Tendensi Sosial di Balik Perumpamaan Unik Lukas: Analisis Tematis Lukas 9:51–19:44” ini merupakan sebuah ulasan untuk menjawab makna di balik pencantuman perumpamaan unik Lukas di dalam pasal 9:51–19:44. Bagian ini menarik karena merupakan narasi menjelang kematian Yesus. Perumpamaan di dalamnya berupa wasiat terakhir dari seseorang yang akan segera mati. Beberapa sarjana telah mengusulkan beragam tafsiran mengenai makna perumpamaan unik tersebut. Melalui metode analisis tematik dan studi literatur, ditemukan hasil bahwa perumpamaan unik dalam Lukas 9:51–19:44 memiliki tendensi sosial, dimana injil berkaitan dengan kesetaraan sosial, kepedulian sosial, dan konsekuensi sosial. Lukas menaruh perhatian yang lebih terhadap kehidupan sosial di dalam Injilnya.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barclay, W. (2001). Gospel of Luke. Lousville: Westminster John Knox Press.
Barrett, K. S. (2012). JUSTIFICATION IN LUKAN THEOLOGY. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.
Blomberg, C. L. (1986). The Miracles as Parables. Gospel Perspectives (Vol. 6): The Miracles of Jesus (Vol. 6, pp. 327–359). Sheffield: JSOT Press.
Blomberg, C. L. (2012). Interpreting the Parables. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press Academic.
Brewer, S. (2009). Wealth and poverty in Luke’s Gospel and Acts: a challenge to the Christian Church. Encounter: Journal for Pentecostal Ministry, 6, 1–27.
Buckwalter, H. D. (2015). The Hike of Hikes - Luke’s Travel Narrative (Luke 9:51–19:27). Evangelical Journal, 33(2), 68–81.
Burge, G. M., & Bailey, K. E. (1983). Through Peasant Eyes: More Lucan Parables, Their Culture and Style. Journal of Biblical Literature (Vol. 102). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Curkpatrick, S. (2003). Parable Metonymy and Luke’s Kerygmatic Framing. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 25(3), 289–307.
Fitzmyer, J. A. (2009). The Gospel According to Luke X-XXIV. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Forbes, G. W. (2000). The God of Old: The Role of the Lukan Parables in the Purpose of Luke’s Gospel. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Garlington, D. (2011). The Salt Of The Earth In Covenantal Perspective. JETS, 54(4).
Ghazaryan Drissi, A. (2019). What Is Transforming Discipleship? The Ecumenical Review, 71(1–2), 216–224.
González, J. L. (2015). The Story Luke Tells: Luke’s Unique Witness to the Gospel. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Green, J. B. (1997). The Gospel of Luke (NICNT). (G. D. Fee, Ed.). Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans.
Green, J. B. (2012). The Theology of the Gospel of Luke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hinson, E. G. (2007). Persistence in Prayer in Luke-Acts. RevExp, 104, 721–736.
Jeong, J. Y. (2011). The Role Of The Lukan Parables In Terms Of The Purpose Of Luke’s Gospel. University of the Free State.
Jeremias, J. (2003). The Parables of Jesus. London: SCM Press.
Joseph, B. C. M. (2017). The Evangelists’ Editorial Efforts; Matthean and Lukan Theology vis-a-vis a Few, Unique Parables. Religious Studies Theses and Dissertations, 2.
King, D. D. M. (2019). Reclaiming the Radical Economic Message of Luke. Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 1590.
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a Thematic Analysis: A Practical, Step-by-Step Guide for Learning and Teaching Scholars. AISHE-J, 8(3), 1–14.
Mann, J. A. (1999). To All Nations: An Exegetical Analysis Of The Parables Of The Lord In Luke. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary.
Mathewson, D. L. (1995). The Parable Of The Unjust Steward (Luke 16:1-13): A Reexamination Of The Traditional View In Light Of Recent Challenges. JETS, 38(1), 29–39.
Mugabe, H. (2014). Parable of the Rich Fool: Luke 12:13–21. Review & Expositor, 111(1), 67–73.
Neville, D. (2021). Rightwising humility: Reviewing Jesus’ parable of the pharisee and the tax agent in Luke 18: 9-14. St Mark’s Review, (256), [97]-107. Teaches New Testament Studies for CSU’s School of Theology, Canberra Campus, St Mark’s National Theological Centre, and Sessional Lecturer for St Francis College in Brisbane and Research Fellow of CSU’s Centre for Public and Contextual Theology (PaCT): St Mark’s National Theological Centre. Retrieved from https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.970703288827978
Noel, W., & Willem, S. (2014). Wealth and poverty in Luke’s gospel and Acts in terms of Brewer’s analysis and its challenge for today’s church. Conspectus : The Journal of the South African Theological Seminary, 18(09), 59–78. South African Theological Seminary (SATS).
Potgieter, A. (2023). Prayerful persistence: Luke 18:1–8 through the lens of resilience. HTS Teologiese Studies, 79(2), 1–6.
Prabowo, P. D., & Kalaka, J. (2023). Gereja yang Berbagi Daya dalam Misi Lintas Budaya: Kajian Misiologis Roma 15:22-33. Manna Rafflesia, 9(2 SE-Articles), 340–354. journals.sttab.ac.id. Retrieved from https://journals.sttab.ac.id/index.php/man_raf/article/view/304
Praeder, S. M. (1988). The Word in Women’s Worlds: Four Parables. Wilmington: Michael Glazier.
Pratt, R. L. (2013). Ia Berikan Kita Kisah-Nya. Surabaya: Momentum.
Ryan, M. (2021). Revisiting the Parable of the Good Samaritan. Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations, 16(1).
Stagg, F. (1997). Luke’s Theological Use of Parables. Review & Expositor, 94(2), 215–229.
Witherington III, B. (2021). LUKE’S JOURNEYING-UP-TO-JERUSALEM MOTIF AND XENOPHON’S ANABASIS. Journal Evangelical Theology Society, 64(2), 303–308.
Wright, N. T. (2015). Jesus and the Victory of God. London: SPCK Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55097/sabda.v4i2.92
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.55097/sabda.v4i2.92.g78
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Sabda: Jurnal Teologi Kristen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Sabda: Jurnal Teologi Kristen has been registered on:
